An Appraisal of the Practice and Procedure of Sulh (Settlement Out of Court) An Islamic Law Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/mahkamah.v4i1.65Keywords:
Appraisal, Practice, Procedure, Settlement, Islamic lawAbstract
Sulh Meaning Amicable Settlement or Conciliation is a Fundamental Mechanism in Islamic Jurisprudence for Resolving disputes outside formal Court Proceedings rooted in the Principle of Justice and Social Harmony. This Appraisal Examines the Legal framework, historical eviction and contemporary application of Sulh in Islamic Law, it explore how Sulh is Structured in the context of different legal schools and compares it with more than Alternatives Dispute Resolution (ADR) Mechanisms highlighting both the Similarities and the features of Islamic Settlement Processes. In Islamic legal Introduction, Sulh is Permissible in matters of Personals disputes, Property Rights, and even some Criminal cases, provided it does not contravene divine injunctions or Public welfare. The appraisal concluded by evaluating the Potential of Sulh in contemporary legal context, advocating for it integration within modern ADR Practices and Proposing reforms to enhance its applicability Particularly in multi-cultural and Pluralistic societies. This Study also highlights the benefit of Sulh in Preventing relationship and promoting Peace making. It is an Enduring Modern Dispute Resolution in both Muslim and Non-Muslims Communities.
Downloads
References
Abdullahi, M.M (2014) The Concept of Sulh in Islamic Law: A Case Study of the Practice and Procedure of the Katsina State Sharia Court (unpublisREFEREhed) Faculty of Law, A.B.U. Zaria p.103
Abi al-Hassan Ali Ibn Abdulsalam Al-Tusali, al-Bahja fi Sharh al Tuhfah, Dar-al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut, Lebanon (nd), Vol.1 pp.350-357.
Abu Dawud, Sunan Abu Dawud, Kitab al-Diyat, vol. 5, hadith no. 4578.
Abubakar, M. S. (2010) The Role of the Sharia in Resolving Armed Conflicts Between Muslims or Between Muslims and Non-Muslims, in Aliyu, I. A. Alternative Dispute Resolution and Some Contemporary Issues, M. O. Press and Publishers, Kaduna, p. 172.
Al-Kasani, Bada’i-al-Sana’i fi Tabrib, al-Shari’ih Vol. 6, p. 47
Al-Mawarah, A.M. (nd) Ahkan al-Sultaniyyah p. 109.
Al-Mudawwanah, Vol. 5, p. 368.
Al-Shafi’i al-Umm, Op. Cit Vol 6, p 312
Al-Tabari, al-Mujam-al-Kabir
Arabi, M.A. Ahkamul Qur’an DarulKutbilIlmiyyah, Vol 1, p 539-544
Ash-Shanqitiy A. (2004), Mawahib al-Jalil min Adillat al-Khalil, Vol.4, Al-Maktab Al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut, Lebanon, p.54-55.
Bukhari; http:www.islamaljayyash.net/alboukhary.html Book 57.
Doi, I.A. (1984) Shariah the Islamic Law, Ta ha Publishers, London
El-Imairi, M.T. (ND)Murafa’at: Procedure and Evidence in Shariah Courts, Unpublished Manuscript, CILS, Institute of Administration, ABU. Zaria
Gopin, Mare (2003) Holy War, Holy Peace; How Religion can Bring Peace to the Middle East. Oxford University Press.
Imam Malik bn Anas, Al-Mudawwanah al-Kubrah, Dar-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut, Lebanon, (nd) vol.3, p.375-398
Imam Muslim, Sahih Muslim, Oaths Muharibin, Retaliation and Blood Money, Book 16, Hadith no. 4171.
Irani, G.E. (2006) Apologies and Reconciliation: Middle Eastern Rituals” Taking Wrong Seriously: Apologies and Reconciliation. Standard, University Press.
Keffi, S.U.D. (2010) The Legal, Social and Economic Roles of As-Sulh from Perspective of jurisprudence (fiqh) of Maliki School, In: In Aliyu I.A Alternative Dispute Resolution and Some Contemporary Issues, M.O Press and Publishers, Kaduna, PP.188-192
Muhammad Ibn Yusuf Al-Dafil, Inkamul-Alaikum Ala Tuhfah Al-Kukkam, Dar.al Fikr, Beirut, Lebanon
Muhammad Muhsin Khan; Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 3 (Eng. Trans) p.533, Beirut.
Nancy Welsh, Making Deal in Court- Connected Mediation
Norjihan A.Z. et al(2016) The Application of Mediation (Sulh) in Islamic Criminal Law. Shariah Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1- 115-136. p. 120.
Reported in Sunan Abu Dawud, Kitaab ad-Diyyaat, Hadith No. 4534; Ibn Majah in Kitaab ad-Diyyaat, Hadith No. 2638.
Sahih al-Bukhari; sulh chapter, Hadith No. 2690.
Sahil al-Bukhari Vol. III Book 57 p. 4.
Sayyid Sabid, Fiqh-Sunnah, Dar-al-Fath, al-Qahira (2009 21st ed) Vol. 3, 210
Shabbir, M. (2013). Outlines of Criminal Law and Justice in Islam, Edward Elgar Publishing, United Kingdom, p. 27.
Shanqity, A. A.S. (2004) Mawahib-al-Jahil min Adillatak-Khalil, Vol. 4 pp 54-55, Al-Maktab, al-Ilmiyyah, Beirut
SilsilatuAhaddethSoheeha, Hadith No 1448
Suleiman, I.A Revolution in History: The Jihad of Usman Danfodio Mansell, London (1986), P26 Suleiman T. the Islamic and the Challenge of Hist: ideals, Policies and Operation of the Sokoto Caliphate, Mansell, London (1987) P.14-20; Muh’d, A.B A Brief History of Shariah in the Defunct Northern Nig, Jos University Press Ltd, (1988)p. 1-5.
Usman, A.M. (2010) Matrimonial Arbitration under Islamic Law: An overview of procedure and practices in Area courts in Aliyu, A.I etl. Alternative Disprib Resolution and some contemporary issues publication of advocate chamber faculty of Law, ABU Zaria, M.D. press and publisher Ltd, Kaduna Nigeria. P14, 144.
Usman, M.B (2010) An Overview of the Theory of Sulh in Civil and Criminal Cases, In: Aliyu, I.A. Alternative Dispute Resolution and Some Contemporary Issues, M.O Press and Publishers, Kaduna, pp 151-168.
Yusuf, A.A. (1938), The Holy Qur’an Text: Translation and Commentary, 3rd Ed. Dar al-Arabia Publishing Printing and Distribution, Beirut, Lebanon.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hamidu Ardo, Abubakar Ibrahim Adamu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
